SHE HONORS AND UPHOLDS GOD'S TEACHING ON
MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE
By Wayne Jackson
Marriage is a covenant between a man and a woman wherein
they agree to become joined to one another for the purpose of
establishing a permanent home. Marriage was instituted by God
with the creation of Adam and Eve. The first couple, being
made male and female, were designed for marriage (Genesis
1:27), and so, it was the purpose of God that man and woman
should have the privilege of becoming "one flesh" in the
divinely organized arrangement of wedlock (Gen. 2:24).
The preservation of the marriage relationship is vitally
important to the well-being of society as a whole. First,
within the family unit there is provided a sphere of stability
wherein one has the right to a family name, security of
property, and an intimate atmosphere of love and trust.
Second, marriage contributes to community solidarity. No
society could long exist without marriage. In fact, "There are
no societies in which marriage does not exist."1
Marriage, in harmony with God's original plan, is certainly
an honorable state: "Let marriage be had in honor among all,
and let the bed be undefiled. . . " (Hebrews 13:4). And while
there may be times of extreme stress or difficulty when it
might be in one's best interest not to marry (cf. 1
Corinthians 7:26, 28, 32, 35, 40), the general principle would
be, "It is not good that man [or woman] should be alone" (Gen.
2:18). The Bible makes it clear that "forbidding to marry" is
contrary to the will of God (1 Timothy 4:1-3).
Holy matrimony, as designed by God, certainly has many
benefits. First, as just indicated, it provides for intimate
personal companionship (Gen. 2:18). Mankind, created in the
image of the triune Godhead (Gen. 1:2;7), is social in
disposition. Second, marriage is the legitimate avenue by
which children are to be brought into the world (Gen. 1:28;
4:1; 1 Tim. 5:14). Jehovah never intended that children be the
product of animalistic breeding experiments! Third, matrimony
affords man and woman a moral and responsible means of
satisfying the God-given sexual appetites of their bodies. The
sexual "bed" is undefiled within valid marriage (Heb. 13:4).
God's divine ideal for the marital union is that it should
last as long as both parties are alive. Death of one of the
marriage partners, of course, terminates this relationship
(Romans 7:2; 1 Cor. 7:39) and there is no "marriage" beyond
the resurrection of the dead (Matthew 22:30).
Divorce -- Since God is the author of marriage, it is His
prerogative and His alone, to determine when a marriage can be
dissolved while both partners are still living. What,
therefore, is the divine will concerning divorce? Ideally, God
"hates" divorce (cf. Malachi 2:16), for even when a valid
divorce is allowed by the Lord, there has been a violation of
the marriage covenant by at least one of the parties. No
divorce can involve two innocent persons; one of them may be,
but at least one will be guilty.
Under the Old Testament system, if a man's wife "found no
favor in his eyes" because he found some unseemly thing in
her, he could write her a "bill of divorcement" and "send her
out of his house" (that is, divorce her) (Deuteronomy 24:1).
Yet, this was not consistent with Heaven's original ideal.
God, through Moses, only tolerated it due to the "hardness of
heart" characteristic of the Israelite people (Matt. 19:8).
Jesus Christ, however, in discussing this very matter,
declared that "from the beginning it hath not been so" (Matt.
19:8). The grammar of this verbally inspired passage implies
that God's original marriage plan, as instituted in Eden, had
ideally never changed, though a relaxation of it had been
allowed under the Mosaic economy.2 Then, in anticipation of
his New Covenant law, Jesus preceeded to restore marriage to
its original intent. Accordingly, the Lord said: "And I say
unto you, whosoever shall put away his wife, except for
fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery"
(Matt. 19:9). Several things may be said of this remarkable
verse.
First, the passage is obviously of universal application,
that is, the whole human family lies under obligation of it.
The term "whosoever" is equal to "every one" (cf. Matt. 5:22,
31, 32). God expects, therefore, every human being who is
capable of entering the marriage union, to be responsible to
His marital code.
Second, Christ taught that no one can "put away" [the word
means "divorce"] his [or her] companion unless the divorce is
on the basis of fornication. The term "fornication" is general
in meaning; it denotes "every kind of unlawful sexual
intercourse."3 The Lord thus allows divorce, and subsequent
remarriage, only on the grounds of fornication. From the
positive angle, this means the innocent partner,4 in a
marriage that has been violated by fornication (extra-marital
sexual conduct), has the right of divorce, and, if desirable,
remarriage. From the negative side, the passage teaches that
one who divorces for some reason other than fornication is not
at liberty to remarry.
Matthew 19:9 affirms that one who divorces a companion,
unless the divorce be for fornication, "committeth adultery."
In the Bible, adultery "denotes any voluntary cohabitation of
a married person with any other than his lawful spouse."5 The
tense of this verb, as used here in the Greek New Testament,
suggests the idea of continued action. In other words, the
person who enters this illicit union "keeps on committing
adultery" each time he is sexually intimate with the new
partner. By the formation of a new "marriage," the individual
"enters the realm of adultery,"6 or, as Prof. William F. Beck
rendered it in his translation, he is "living in adultery."7
The reason why this new union is called "adultery" is quite
obvious; though the divorced person has joined him- self to a
new mate [according to human legal requirements], according to
the law of God, he is still married to his original wife. The
new union is thus not approved by God.
In Matthew 5:32 Christ taught that "every one that putteth
away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, maketh her
an adulteress . . . " She is not an adulteress simply because
she has been put away, of course. But this divorced woman will
likely marry again, and in so doing, she will be entering an
adulterous union.
Some have attempted to establish that there is another
reason for divorce, namely if a Christian, who is married to
an unbeliever, is deserted by that infidel mate, the Christian
is free to form a new marriage. It is claimed that proof for
this view is to be found in 1 Corinthians 7:15, where, in the
case of an unbeliever leaving the Christian, the Christian "is
not under bondage." Some contend that the Christian is thus
released from the "bondage" of marriage and so may remarry.
However, this is not the case. The term "bondage" literally
means "enslavement" (see Titus 2:3 where the same Greek word
is translated "enslaved"), and the marriage relationship has
never been viewed as an enslavement ! The apostle is simply
saying that if the unbeliever threatens to depart if the
Christian does not forsake Christ, then the Christian may "let
him depart." One is not obligated to be enslaved to that
unbelieving spirit of rebellion. But, as one scholar notes,
"Nothing is said about a second marriage for the believer; it
is vain to put words in Paul's mouth when he is silent."8
The New Testament teaching regarding divorce and remarriage
is very strict, especially in view of modern society's loose
and compromising views of morality. And there is no question
but that many people have, through ignorance, involved
themselves in some heart-breaking, though immoral,
relationships. But this important truth must be observed;
while we should be compassionate towards the weak and sinful
by attempting to help them, we cannot lower the standards of
the Holy Scriptures to a degenerate society ! Rather, we must
encourage and challenge noble people to rise to the elevating
authority of God's inspired Truth. Christianity requires great
sacrifices; it has even cost many their very lives. But
regardless of the costs, let us be brave enough to seek the
Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth. Churches of
Christ urge their fellow-citizens to respect and extol the
virtues of the home as ordained by Almighty God.
1 Ashley Montague, The Cultured Man, New York: Permabooks,
1959, p. 240.
2 M. R. Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament,
Wilmington, DE: Associated Publishers & Authors, 1972, p. 65.
3 William Arndt & F .W. Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon
of the New Testament,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967, p. 699.
4 By "innocent" we mean one who has not only been sexually
faithful to his [or her} spouse, but also who has not, by
means of designing schemes, driven that partner to
fornication.
5 J. Theodore Mueller, "Adultery," Baker's Dictionary of
Theology, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1960, p. 27.
6 Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 1976, II, p. 583.
7 William F. Beck, THE NEW TESTAMENT in the Language of
Today, St. Louis: Concordia, 1963, p. 37.
8 Lewis Johnson Jr., "1 Corinthians," Wycliff Bible
Commentary, London: Oliphants, 1963, p. 1240.
QUESTIONS
Who is the original author of marriage?
What is the significance of two becoming one flesh?
Name and discuss some benefits of marriage.
Under what circumstances does God allow divorce and
remarriage?
Why did Moses allow the Hebrews to divorce for many causes?
Upon what did Jesus base his teaching on divorce?
To be pleasing to God, those unlawfully divorced should. .
. ?
How can we strengthen our marriages against the ravages of
divorce?