SHE BELIEVES THE MIRACLES OF BIBLE TIMES
ARE NO LONGER AVAILABLE
By Claude A. Guild
The above title does not mean the church today denies the
miracles of creation, the flood, the walls of Jericho story,
the virgin birth of Christ or his resurrection. Miracles
confirmed the sonship of Jesus. "These are written that ye may
believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God. . ." (John
20:31). To disbelieve these miracles and look for modern-day
miracles outside the Book demonstrates our lack of faith in
the Bible and the Son of God it reveals.
MIRACULOUS GIFTS
Like scaffolding, a temporary platform for workmen on a new
building, miraculous gifts were temporary to enable the early
church time to mature and grow. Instruction had to be given in
the absence of a written, confirmed, complete and perfect
revelation. These gifts were to last "till we all attain unto
the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of
God, unto the fullgrown man, unto the measure of the stature
of the fullness of Christ. . ." (Ephesians 4:13).
These gifts came through the laying on of the apostles'
hands. The apostles had to go to Samaria to lay hands on those
Philip had converted and bestow gifts on them, because Philip
could not do it (Acts 8:16). Paul laid his hands on twelve men
at Ephesus and they spoke in tongues and prophesied (Acts
19:6). The seven deacons, including Philip, received the
laying on of hands of the apostles (Acts 6:6). Paul laid his
hands on Timothy to enable him to receive a special gift (2
Timothy 1:6). Finally, Paul longed to go to Rome, "that I may
impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be
established" (Romans 1:11).
It is very, very important that we keep in mind the
third-persons with reference to miraculous gifts. Only the
apostles could give the nine miraculous gifts (1 Cor.
12:4-11). The ones upon whom they laid their hands could not
impart the gifts to the third-person Christians. If they
could, why didn't Philip bestow the gifts on the Christians in
Samaria? Therefore, when the apostles died, their hands died
with them and the ability to bestow gifts by "the laying on of
hands" died also.
We must keep in mind that there are other measures of the
Spirit. One, Christ possessed the Spirit "without measure"
(John 3:34). Two, there was the baptismal mea- sure of the
Spirit for the apostles and the household of Cornelius (cf.
Acts 2:1-4; Acts 10:44-45). Holy Spirit baptism was always
spoken of in promise and not commanded (Matthew 3:1; Acts
1:4-5). There is the general measure of the Spirit. I like to
call it the kinship measure of the Spirit. This measure is
received by every child of God and makes us kin to God (cf.
Rom. 8:9; 1 Cor 6:19-20; 3:16-17; Acts 5:32; Eph. 1:13-14).
THE NINE GIFTS
The miraculous gifts are named in Paul's letter to the
Corinthians. He states: "For to one is given through the
Spirit the word of wisdom; and to another the word of
knowledge according to the same Spirit; to another faith in
the same Spirit; and to another, gifts of healings, in the one
Spirit; and to another workings of miracles; and to another
prophecy; and to another discerning of spirits; and to another
divers kinds of tongues; and to another the interpretation of
tongues. . . dividing to each one severally even as he will"
(1 Cor. 12:8-11). These gifts relate specifically to the
infant church when it did not have the completed revelation of
God as we have today. There was a special need then that does
not exist now. The gifts were to confirm the word (Hebrews
2:1-4). They helped the church grow and keep out false
teachers (Eph. 4:11-15).
The word preached by the apostles was oral. They didn't
have a New Testament like we have today. It was being written.
Therefore, they had these gifts and could bestow them on
others to confirm the spoken word. "How shall we escape, if we
neglect so great a salvation? which having at the first been
spoken through the Lord, was con- firmed unto us by them that
heard him; God also bearing witness with them both by signs
and wonders, and by manifold powers and by gifts of the Holy
Spirit, according to his own will" (Heb. 2:3-4). When my wife
and I married in Altus, Oklahoma, forty-two years ago, our
marriage license was signed and sealed by the county clerk of
Jackson County representing the State of Oklahoma. I do not
have to go back to Altus once a week, or once a year to see if
it is still confirmed. Since Paul said it "was confirmed," and
it is in the past tense, we learn two important lessons:
First, the signs, wonders and gifts of the Spirit were
manifested through the miraculous gifts. Secondly, for us to
look for confirming signs today, exemplifies our lack of faith
in the miracles of the apostles and the genuineness of the
word of God.
THAT WHICH IS PERFECT
After discussing the nine miraculous gifts in the 12th
chapter of First Corinthians, Paul wanted to point up a "More
excellent way" (1 Cor. 12:31), hence he points to the way of
love in the 13th chapter. He puts a deadline and dateline on
the miraculous gifts by saying, "Love never faileth: but
whether there be prophecies, they shall be done away; whether
there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be
knowledge, it shall be done away. For we know in part, and we
prophesy in part; but when that which is perfect is come, that
which is in part shall be done away" (1 Cor. 13:8-9).
This passage is like the man on the Jericho Road. "He fell
among robbers who both stripped him and beat him, and
departed, leaving him half dead" (Luke 10:30). The Pentecostal
people have misused and abused this passage with a desire to
perpetuate their glossolalia or tongue speaking positions. The
three chapters (12-13-14) viewed in the context will not allow
the miraculous gifts to be permanent; but spiritual gifts, the
more excellent way, are to remain (13:13). But what does the
phrase "when that which is perfect. . .," mean? It does not
mean that evidence of salvation was the baptism of the Holy
Spirit and evidence of the baptism of the Holy Spirit was the
ability to speak in tongues. Wayne A. Robinson, Vice President
of the Oral Roberts Evangelistic Association, gave up his
association with Oral Roberts because of the abuse of these
gifts. Referring to the questions "Are all apostles? are all
prophets? are all teachers? are all workers of miracles? have
all gifts of healing? do all speak in tongues? do all
interpret?. . ." (1 Cor. 12:29-30), Robinson said, "How about
answering the same question that Paul posed to the
Corinthians: 'Have all gifts of healing? do all speak with
tongues?' Internally, I admitted that the implied answer to
each question was 'no.'. . . The New Testament clearly teaches
that all Christians have the Holy Spirit, and the overriding
evidence of this presence is never tongues."1
This passage does not refer to the second coming of Christ.
The grammar alone will not allow it. Gary Workman states,
"Paul uses a neuter article and substantive (an adjective used
as a noun). It could therefore be translated, 'the perfect
thing.' Jesus, however, is spoken of not as a thing but as a
person. Thus, he is consistently referred to in masculine
terms. Jesus would therefore be a 'he who', not a 'that
which.'"2
When the scriptures were completed; the oral message spoken
and the gifts to confirm that message were recorded, we
received that "perfect law, the law of liberty" (James 1:25).
It is therefore the New Testament that circumscribes his
church today. H. Leo Boles said, "We have a perfect record of
these gifts which were bestowed to help confirm the preaching
of the word; there was no need for a continuation of them
after his full gospel had been revealed and confirmed and a
record made to preserve it."3
Frank Pack states it very well: "It is incorrect to simply
assume that because a spiritual gift is listed in the New
Testament period, it must exist today. . . The form of the
questions in 1 Corinthians 12:29-30 ('do all speak with
tongues?') points out the self-evident fact that not every
Christian was meant to possess every gift, since all
Christians were not apostles, nor all prophets, neither did
all speak with tongues, nor work miracles of various kinds."4
Finally, with reference to 1 Corinthians 13:9, "For we know
in part, and we prophesy in part," we have always had perfect
knowledge in quality but not in quantity. Likewise, we have
always had perfect prophecy in quality but not in quantity.
But when Jesus' revelation came, miraculous gifts ceased and
we have today perfect knowledge and prophecy in quality and
quantity.
1 Robinson, Wayne A., I Once Spoke in Tongues, (Tyndale
House, Wheaton, III., 1973) pp. 55, 141.
2 Workman, Gary, Spiritual Sword, (Getwell Rd. Church,
Memphis, Tenn., April, 1981) p. 13.
3 Boles, H. Leo, The Holy Spirit, His Personality, Nature,
Work, (Gospel Advocate Company, Nashville, Tenn., 1971), p.
175.
4 Pack, Frank, Tongues and the Holy Spirit, (Biblical
Research Press, Abilene, Texas, 1972), pp. 106-107.
QUESTIONS
In what sense are the miracles of the Apostolic Age like
scaffolding?
How did we receive miraculous gifts?
Why were miracles given?
Did all first century Christians have miraculous gifts?
At what point in history did the miracles cease?
If divine miracles ceased to be given at the end of the
first century, how do we account for the claims of modern day
miracle workers?